Most security RFPs ask for a price against a headcount. That is how you end up comparing four proposals that are not comparable.
The problem with most security tenders is that they specify an input — "provide four guards" — and then compare prices. Every bidder quotes the same four guards, the cheapest wins, and the client has selected for whoever is cutting the most corners.
A good RFP specifies the outcome and the evidence, and lets providers tell you what it takes. This template does that. It is free; use it against us as well as anyone else.
Give bidders enough to quote honestly. Vagueness here guarantees you receive four incomparable proposals.
Every bidder will say they are licensed. Require them to prove it, and score it.
These are the ones providers dislike. That is why they belong in the RFP.
Require the same breakdown from everyone, or you cannot compare anything:
Put these in the RFP, not the negotiation:
Detail on drafting: how to write a security guard contract.
Do not score on price alone. In this market the cheapest bid is almost never efficiency — it is a corner cut somewhere you cannot see, usually the guard's registration or wage, and the risk lands on you.
Weight compliance evidence and the Section 3 answers heavily. A provider who scores well there and is 15% more expensive is, in almost every case, the cheaper option over the contract's life.
We publish this because the questions in Section 3 are ones we are comfortable answering, and because a client who buys on evidence rather than price stays for years. Send us your RFP — and send it to three other providers as well.
Related: how to evaluate a security company · how many guards do you need
The outcome and the evidence required, not just a headcount. 'No unauthorised access to the plant floor; all outbound material logged' is a specification. 'Four guards' is a purchase order — and it guarantees you receive proposals that are identical on paper and incomparable in reality.
A valid MOI licence with its expiry date, with the entity name matching the entity that will sign the contract; GOSI registration evidence for the guards; Saudization status; HCIS certification if your site requires it; and liability insurance with coverage limits. Demand documents, not claims.
Guard turnover rate, and whether guards will be dedicated to your site by name. High turnover means your site will never have a guard who knows it — and the invoice looks identical either way. The second most revealing: 'if our staff instruct your guard to detain a suspected thief, what will he do?'
Rarely. In this market the cheapest bid is almost never efficiency — it is a corner cut somewhere you cannot see, usually the guard's registration or wage, and the liability lands on you. Weight compliance evidence heavily; a provider 15% more expensive who scores well on evidence is usually cheaper over the life of the contract.
Require the same pricing breakdown from everyone, including the guard count behind the coverage figure. That single requirement exposes anyone quoting 24-hour cover on fewer than three guards per post — which is either a labour-rules breach or an empty post during hours you will never audit.
This security guard RFP template for Saudi Arabia is free to use, adapt, and reference — including in a tender against us. If it is useful to you, a link back helps others find it.
Cite as: Security Guard RFP Template, Arab Security Guard Services. https://www.arabsecurityguardservices.com/resources/security-guard-rfp-template/
Ask us — including the awkward ones. We would rather answer them now than have you discover the answer during an incident.
Message us on WhatsApp Request a Quote